I find myself repeating the same thing time and again as people share ideas of what we ought to do as a church. I tell them...
The biggest problem with that idea is that it might work.
There are many things that are distractions masquerading as good ideas. Others simply wouldn't be easily repeated or sustained. A few are completely reasonable in and of themselves, but they have no real value to the organizational mission. The most rare are sure to happen eventually, but only in due time.
In a community environment it is important to foster creativity and entrepreneurship. Rather than saying "no" to these ideas I generally tell people to start doing it and that we might join them. I tell them that we'd much rather celebrate and endorse them than start it. When we do start things we want to be sure that:
- they advance the mission
- we have a leader we trust
- we have the margin
- we have a plan to sustain them
- we see them work elsewhere or on a smaller scale
- they are not already being done
We'd much rather CELEBRATE, ENDORSE, or JOIN successful things than START new things.
By this point in the conversation it generally becomes clear that by "we should do" they often mean "you should do." Alternatively, they had a plan and all they wanted from you was the church facilities and platform. Either way the idea goes away and sometimes the person as well. I can't think of one case where either departure was a bad thing.
You can't fully plan for success. Success is full of challenges. You can decide what things you'll try to make successful. It's similar to hiring people. It's easier to screen them out then fire them. Same thing for programs. It's easier to say no before the program has a following that tells you that you can't stop it because it is SUCCEEDING.
As I write this post many ideas come to mind, but none more sharply than the oft requested "Parents Night Out". Anything come to your mind?